Skip to content


Halpert Vs. Udall - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number379 U.S. 645
AppellantHalpert
RespondentUdall
Excerpt:
.....motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. winkle v. bannan, 379 u.s. 645 (1965) 379 u.s. 645 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court winkle v. bannan, 379 u.s. 645 (1965) 379 u.s. 645 winkle v. bannan, warden. appeal from the supreme court of michigan. no. 553. decided january 18, 1965. motion to strike excerpts from motion to dismiss denied; appeal dismissed; and certiorari denied. walter a. kurz and dennis boyle for appellant. frank j. kelley, attorney general of michigan, and james r. ramsey, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to strike excerpts from the motion to dismiss is denied. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of.....
Judgment:
HALPERT v. UDALL - 379 U.S. 645 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court HALPERT v. UDALL, 379 U.S. 645 (1965) 379 U.S. 645

HALPERT ET AL. v. UDALL, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
FLORIDA. No. 552.
Decided January 18, 1965.

231 F. Supp. 574, affirmed.

Leo M. Alpert for appellants.

Solicitor General Cox, Roger P. Marquis and Herbert Pittle for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


WINKLE v. BANNAN, <a href="/101251"> 379 U.S. 645 </a> (1965) 379 U.S. 645 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court WINKLE v. BANNAN, 379 U.S. 645 (1965) 379 U.S. 645

WINKLE v. BANNAN, WARDEN.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 553.
Decided January 18, 1965.

Motion to strike excerpts from motion to dismiss denied; appeal dismissed; and certiorari denied.

Walter A. Kurz and Dennis Boyle for appellant.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan, and James R. Ramsey, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to strike excerpts from the motion to dismiss is denied. The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 379 U.S. 645, 646




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //