Skip to content


Voorhes Vs. Dempsey - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number379 U.S. 648
AppellantVoorhes
RespondentDempsey
Excerpt:
.....1965. 231 f. supp. 975, affirmed. colin c. tait for appellants. harold m. mulvey, attorney general of connecticut, and raymond j. cannon, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. lyles v. beto, 379 u.s. 648 (1965) 379 u.s. 648 (1965) "> u.s. supreme court lyles v. beto, 379 u.s. 648 (1965) 379 u.s. 648 lyles v. beto, corrections director. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fifth circuit. no. 263, misc. decided january 18, 1965. certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded. reported below: 329 f.2d 332 . e. d. vickery for petitioner. waggoner carr,.....
Judgment:
VOORHES v. DEMPSEY - 379 U.S. 648 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court VOORHES v. DEMPSEY, 379 U.S. 648 (1965) 379 U.S. 648

VOORHES ET AL. v. DEMPSEY, GOVERNOR OF CONNECTICUT, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF
CONNECTICUT. No. 600.
Decided January 18, 1965.

231 F. Supp. 975, affirmed.

Colin C. Tait for appellants.

Harold M. Mulvey, Attorney General of Connecticut, and Raymond J. Cannon, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


LYLES v. BETO, <a href="/101254"> 379 U.S. 648 </a> (1965) 379 U.S. 648 (1965) "> U.S. Supreme Court LYLES v. BETO, 379 U.S. 648 (1965) 379 U.S. 648

LYLES v. BETO, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 263, Misc.
Decided January 18, 1965.

Certiorari granted; judgment vacated; and case remanded.

Reported below: 329 F.2d 332 .

E. D. Vickery for petitioner.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, and Sam R. Wilson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Massiah v. United States, 377 U.S. 201 .

Page 379 U.S. 648, 649




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //