Skip to content


U.S. Vs. Utah Construction and Mining Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 900
AppellantU.S.
RespondentUtah Construction and Mining Co.
Excerpt:
u.s. v. utah construction and mining co. - 382 u.s. 900 (1965) u.s. supreme court u.s. v. utah construction and mining co. , 382 u.s. 900 (1965) 382 u.s. 900 united states, petitioner, v. utah construction and mining co. no. 440. supreme court of the united states november 8, 1965 acting solicitor general spritzer, assistant attorney general douglas, morton hollander and david l. rose, for the united states. gardiner johnson and thomas e. stanton, jr., for respondent. petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of claims granted. case placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following no. 439.[ u.s. v. utah construction and mining co. 382 u.s. 90 (1965) ]
Judgment:
U.S. v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO. - 382 U.S. 900 (1965)
U.S. Supreme Court U.S. v. UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO. , 382 U.S. 900 (1965)

382 U.S. 900

UNITED STATES, petitioner,
v.
UTAH CONSTRUCTION AND MINING CO.
No. 440.

Supreme Court of the United States

November 8, 1965

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and David L. Rose, for the United States.

Gardiner Johnson and Thomas E. Stanton, Jr., for respondent.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Claims granted. Case placed on the summary calendar and set for oral argument immediately following No. 439.[ U.S. v. Utah Construction and Mining Co. 382 U.S. 90 (1965) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //