Skip to content


Heider, Administrator Vs. Michigan Sugar Co. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 362
AppellantHeider, Administrator
RespondentMichigan Sugar Co.
Excerpt:
heider, administrator v. michigan sugar co. - 385 u.s. 362 (1966) u.s. supreme court heider, administrator v. michigan sugar co., 385 u.s. 362 (1966) 385 u.s. 362 heider, administrator v. michigan sugar co. certiorari to the supreme court of michigan. no. 48. argued december 8, 1966. decided december 12, 1966. 375 mich. 490, 134 n. w. 2d 637, dismissed. gregory m. pillon argued the cause for petitioner. with him on the brief was thomas c. mayer. harry m. plotkin argued the cause for respondent. with him on the brief was carl h. smith. per curiam. the writ is dismissed as improvidently granted. page 385 u.s. 362, 363
Judgment:
HEIDER, ADMINISTRATOR v. MICHIGAN SUGAR CO. - 385 U.S. 362 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court HEIDER, ADMINISTRATOR v. MICHIGAN SUGAR CO., 385 U.S. 362 (1966) 385 U.S. 362

HEIDER, ADMINISTRATOR v. MICHIGAN SUGAR CO.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN.
No. 48.
Argued December 8, 1966.
Decided December 12, 1966.

375 Mich. 490, 134 N. W. 2d 637, dismissed.

Gregory M. Pillon argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Thomas C. Mayer.

Harry M. Plotkin argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Carl H. Smith.

PER CURIAM.

The writ is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Page 385 U.S. 362, 363




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //