Skip to content


Battaglia Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 115
AppellantBattaglia
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
battaglia v. united states - 385 u.s. 115 (1966) u.s. supreme court battaglia v. united states, 385 u.s. 115 (1966) 385 u.s. 115 battaglia et al., dba produce transport dispatch v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of oregon. no. 564. decided november 21, 1966. affirmed. earle v. white for appellants. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, howard e. shapiro, robert ginnane and betty jo christian for the united states et al. randall b. kester, john f. weisser, jr., james w. nisbet, j. d. feeney and ed white for railroad appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice harlan is of the opinion that.....
Judgment:
BATTAGLIA v. UNITED STATES - 385 U.S. 115 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court BATTAGLIA v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 115 (1966) 385 U.S. 115

BATTAGLIA ET AL., DBA PRODUCE TRANSPORT DISPATCH v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 564.
Decided November 21, 1966.

Affirmed.

Earle V. White for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al. Randall B. Kester, John F. Weisser, Jr., James W. Nisbet, J. D. Feeney and Ed White for railroad appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 385 U.S. 115, 116




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //