Skip to content


Amalgamated Transit Union Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 38
AppellantAmalgamated Transit Union
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
amalgamated transit union v. united states - 385 u.s. 38 (1966) u.s. supreme court amalgamated transit union v. united states, 385 u.s. 38 (1966) 385 u.s. 38 amalgamated transit union, afl-cio v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. no. 496. decided november 7, 1966. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 497, international brotherhood of teamsters, chauffeurs, warehousemen & helpers of america et al. v. united states et al., also on appeal from the same court. 253 f. supp. 481, affirmed. i. j. gromfine and herman sternstein for appellant in no. 496. david previant and herbert s. thatcher for appellants in no. 497. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney.....
Judgment:
AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION v. UNITED STATES - 385 U.S. 38 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 38 (1966) 385 U.S. 38

AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
No. 496.
Decided November 7, 1966. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 497, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America et al. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.

253 F. Supp. 481, affirmed.

I. J. Gromfine and Herman Sternstein for appellant in No. 496.

David Previant and Herbert S. Thatcher for appellants in No. 497.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Charles L. Marinaccio, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. in both cases.

James E. Wilson and Warren Woods for American Buslines, Inc., and Robert J. Corber for National Association of Motor Bus Owners, appellees in No. 496.

William T. Croft for Overnite Transportation Co. et al., appellees in No. 497.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 385 U.S. 38, 39




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //