Skip to content


Colorado-ute Electric Assoc. Vs. Western Colorado Power - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 22
AppellantColorado-ute Electric Assoc.
RespondentWestern Colorado Power
Excerpt:
.....court of colorado. no. 437. decided october 24, 1966. 159 colo. 262, 411 p.2d 785, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. john a. hughes, raphael j. moses and john j. conway for appellant. francis m. shea, william h. dempsey, jr., and john r. barry for appellees western colorado power co. et al. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. bradford v. gavagan, 385 u.s. 22 (1966) 385 u.s. 22 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court bradford v. gavagan, 385 u.s. 22 (1966) 385 u.s. 22 bradford v. gavagan, justice of the supreme court of the state of new.....
Judgment:
COLORADO-UTE ELECTRIC ASSOC. v. WESTERN COLORADO POWER - 385 U.S. 22 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court COLORADO-UTE ELECTRIC ASSOC. v. WESTERN COLORADO POWER, 385 U.S. 22 (1966) 385 U.S. 22

COLORADO-UTE ELECTRIC ASSOCIATION, INC. v. WESTERN COLORADO POWER CO.
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO. No. 437.
Decided October 24, 1966.

159 Colo. 262, 411 P.2d 785, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

John A. Hughes, Raphael J. Moses and John J. Conway for appellant.

Francis M. Shea, William H. Dempsey, Jr., and John R. Barry for appellees Western Colorado Power Co. et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


BRADFORD v. GAVAGAN, <a href="/101310"> 385 U.S. 22 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 22 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court BRADFORD v. GAVAGAN, 385 U.S. 22 (1966) 385 U.S. 22

BRADFORD v. GAVAGAN, JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE
OF NEW YORK, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK. No. 574, Misc.
Decided October 24, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Appellant pro se.

Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Brenda Soloff, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 22, 23




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //