Skip to content


Morris Park, Inc. Vs. Buck - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 2
AppellantMorris Park, Inc.
RespondentBuck
Excerpt:
morris park, inc. v. buck - 385 u.s. 2 (1966) u.s. supreme court morris park, inc. v. buck, 385 u.s. 2 (1966) 385 u.s. 2 morris park, inc. v. buck. appeal from the supreme court of errors of connecticut. no. 113. decided october 10, 1966. 153 conn. 290, 216 a. 2d 187, appeal dismissed. francis b. feeley and james t. healey for appellant. robert h. alcorn for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice black is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. page 385 u.s. 2, 3 jones v. association of the bar of the city of new york, 385 u.s. 2 (1966) 385 u.s. 2 (1966) "> u.s. supreme.....
Judgment:
MORRIS PARK, INC. v. BUCK - 385 U.S. 2 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court MORRIS PARK, INC. v. BUCK, 385 U.S. 2 (1966) 385 U.S. 2

MORRIS PARK, INC. v. BUCK.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF CONNECTICUT.
No. 113.
Decided October 10, 1966.

153 Conn. 290, 216 A. 2d 187, appeal dismissed.

Francis B. Feeley and James T. Healey for appellant.

Robert H. Alcorn for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 385 U.S. 2, 3


JONES v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, <a href="/101315"> 385 U.S. 2 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 2 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court JONES v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 2 (1966) 385 U.S. 2

JONES v. ASSOCIATION OF THE BAR OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 102.
Decided October 10, 1966.

16 N. Y. 2d 829, 210 N. E. 2d 461, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Ralph B. Raukx for appellant.

John G. Bonomi for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //