Skip to content


Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 3
AppellantBaltimore and Ohio Railroad Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
.....& ohio railroad co. v. united states - 385 u.s. 3 (1966) u.s. supreme court baltimore & ohio railroad co. v. united states, 385 u.s. 3 (1966) 385 u.s. 3 baltimore & ohio railroad co. et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of pennsylvania. no. 104. decided october 10, 1966. 249 f. supp. 712, affirmed. samuel p. delisi and edward a. kaier for appellants. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, howard e. shapiro, charles l. marinaccio and robert w. ginnane for the united states et al. james m. carter for appellee erie-lackawanna railroad co. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. buchanan v. rhodes,.....
Judgment:
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES - 385 U.S. 3 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 3 (1966) 385 U.S. 3

BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 104.
Decided October 10, 1966.

249 F. Supp. 712, affirmed.

Samuel P. Delisi and Edward A. Kaier for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Charles L. Marinaccio and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al. James M. Carter for appellee Erie-Lackawanna Railroad Co.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


BUCHANAN v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, <a href="/101316"> 385 U.S. 3 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 3 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court BUCHANAN v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, 385 U.S. 3 (1966) 385 U.S. 3

BUCHANAN ET AL. v. RHODES, GOVERNOR OF OHIO, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 115.
Decided October 10, 1966.

249 F. Supp. 860, appeal dismissed.

Richard M. Markus for appellants.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Page 385 U.S. 3, 4




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //