Skip to content


Jordan Vs. Village of Menomonee Falls - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 4
AppellantJordan
RespondentVillage of Menomonee Falls
Excerpt:
.....and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. bennett v. united states, 385 u.s. 4 (1966) 385 u.s. 4 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court bennett v. united states, 385 u.s. 4 (1966) 385 u.s. 4 bennett v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of claims. no. 143. decided october 10, 1966. certiorari granted; 174 ct. cl. 492, 356 f.2d 525 , vacated and remanded. carl l. shipley for petitioner. solicitor general marshall for the united states. per curiam. in light of the suggestion of the solicitor general and upon an examination of the papers filed in this case, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the united.....
Judgment:
JORDAN v. VILLAGE OF MENOMONEE FALLS - 385 U.S. 4 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court JORDAN v. VILLAGE OF MENOMONEE FALLS, 385 U.S. 4 (1966) 385 U.S. 4

JORDAN ET AL v. VILLAGE OF MENOMONEE FALLS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN.
No. 122.
Decided October 10, 1966.

28 Wis. 2d 608, 137 N. W. 2d 442, appeal dismissed.

Emil Hersh, Arthur Magidson, Joseph A. Fanelli and James H. Mann for appellants.

Patrick T. Sheedy for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BENNETT v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101317"> 385 U.S. 4 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 4 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court BENNETT v. UNITED STATES, 385 U.S. 4 (1966) 385 U.S. 4

BENNETT v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF CLAIMS.
No. 143.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 174 Ct. Cl. 492, 356 F.2d 525 , vacated and remanded.

Carl L. Shipley for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

In light of the suggestion of the Solicitor General and upon an examination of the papers filed in this case, the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment of the United States Court of Claims is vacated and the case is remanded to that court.

Page 385 U.S. 4, 5




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //