Skip to content


Annbar Associates Vs. West Side Redevelopment Corp. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 5
AppellantAnnbar Associates
RespondentWest Side Redevelopment Corp.
Excerpt:
.....associates v. west side redevelopment corp. - 385 u.s. 5 (1966) u.s. supreme court annbar associates v. west side redevelopment corp., 385 u.s. 5 (1966) 385 u.s. 5 annbar associates et al. v. west side redevelopment corp. et al. appeal from the supreme court of missouri. no. 152. decided october 10, 1966. 397 s. w. 2d 635, appeal dismissed. william m. kufeld for appellants. guy w. rice for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. glick v. ballentine produce inc., 385 u.s. 5 (1966) 385 u.s. 5 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court glick v. ballentine produce inc., 385 u.s. 5 (1966) 385 u.s. 5 glick et.....
Judgment:
ANNBAR ASSOCIATES v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP. - 385 U.S. 5 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court ANNBAR ASSOCIATES v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP., 385 U.S. 5 (1966) 385 U.S. 5

ANNBAR ASSOCIATES ET AL. v. WEST SIDE REDEVELOPMENT CORP. ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 152.
Decided October 10, 1966.

397 S. W. 2d 635, appeal dismissed.

William M. Kufeld for appellants.

Guy W. Rice for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


GLICK v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., <a href="/101318"> 385 U.S. 5 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 5 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court GLICK v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., 385 U.S. 5 (1966) 385 U.S. 5

GLICK ET AL. v. BALLENTINE PRODUCE INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI.
No. 168.
Decided October 10, 1966.

396 S. W. 2d 609, appeal dismissed.

Elwyn L. Cady, Jr., for appellants.

Morris H. Kross, John R. Caslavka, Harry P. Thomson, Jr., and E. E. Thompson for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 5, 6




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //