Skip to content


KronsbeIn Vs. Trustees of Schools of Township Three - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 6
AppellantKronsbein
RespondentTrustees of Schools of Township Three
Excerpt:
.....of illinois. no. 183. decided october 10, 1966. 33 ill. 2d 575, 213 n. e. 2d 261, appeal dismissed. kenneth f. kelly for appellant. g. william horsley for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. board of satanta joint rural high v. grant cty. plan., 385 u.s. 6 (1966) 385 u.s. 6 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court board of satanta joint rural high v. grant cty. plan., 385 u.s. 6 (1966) 385 u.s. 6 board of satanta joint rural high school district no. 2 et al. v. grant county planning board et al. appeal from the supreme court of kansas. no. 192. decided october 10, 1966. 195 kan. 640, 408 p.2d 655, appeal.....
Judgment:
KRONSBEIN v. TRUSTEES OF SCHOOLS OF TOWNSHIP THREE - 385 U.S. 6 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court KRONSBEIN v. TRUSTEES OF SCHOOLS OF TOWNSHIP THREE, 385 U.S. 6 (1966) 385 U.S. 6

KRONSBEIN v. TRUSTEES OF SCHOOLS OF TOWNSHIP THREE ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS.
No. 183.
Decided October 10, 1966.

33 Ill. 2d 575, 213 N. E. 2d 261, appeal dismissed.

Kenneth F. Kelly for appellant.

G. William Horsley for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


BOARD OF SATANTA JOINT RURAL HIGH v. GRANT CTY. PLAN., <a href="/101319"> 385 U.S. 6 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 6 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court BOARD OF SATANTA JOINT RURAL HIGH v. GRANT CTY. PLAN., 385 U.S. 6 (1966) 385 U.S. 6

BOARD OF SATANTA JOINT RURAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2 ET AL. v. GRANT
COUNTY PLANNING BOARD ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS. No. 192.
Decided October 10, 1966.

195 Kan. 640, 408 P.2d 655, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Dale M. Stucky for appellants.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 385 U.S. 6, 7




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //