Skip to content


Ferrante Vs. City of New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number385 U.S. 9
AppellantFerrante
RespondentCity of New York
Excerpt:
.....is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. page 385 u.s. 9, 10 united states v. ohio, 385 u.s. 9 (1966) 385 u.s. 9 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court united states v. ohio, 385 u.s. 9 (1966) 385 u.s. 9 united states v. ohio. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit. no. 271. decided october 10, 1966. certiorari granted; 354 f.2d 549 , reversed. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general douglas, morton hollander and j. f. bishop for the united states. william b. saxbe, attorney general of ohio, and gerald a. donahue, first assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari.....
Judgment:
FERRANTE v. CITY OF NEW YORK - 385 U.S. 9 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court FERRANTE v. CITY OF NEW YORK, 385 U.S. 9 (1966) 385 U.S. 9

FERRANTE v. CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 277.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Henry Mark Holzer for appellant.

J. Lee Rankin for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 385 U.S. 9, 10


UNITED STATES v. OHIO, <a href="/101322"> 385 U.S. 9 </a> (1966) 385 U.S. 9 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. OHIO, 385 U.S. 9 (1966) 385 U.S. 9

UNITED STATES v. OHIO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 271.
Decided October 10, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 354 F.2d 549 , reversed.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Douglas, Morton Hollander and J. F. Bishop for the United States.

William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Gerald A. Donahue, First Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment is reversed. Wickard v. Filburn, 317 U.S. 111 .




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //