Skip to content


Leon Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number384 U.S. 882
AppellantLeon
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
leon v. united states - 384 u.s. 882 (1966) u.s. supreme court leon v. united states, 384 u.s. 882 (1966) 384 u.s. 882 leon v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the district of columbia circuit. no. 573. decided june 20, 1966. certiorari granted; 120 u.s. app. d.c. 392, 347 f.2d 486 , vacated and remanded. edward l. carey and walter e. gillcrist for petitioner. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general vinson and beatrice rosenberg for the united states. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of dennis v. united states, ante, p. 855. .....
Judgment:
LEON v. UNITED STATES - 384 U.S. 882 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court LEON v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 882 (1966) 384 U.S. 882

LEON v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT. No. 573.
Decided June 20, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 120 U.S. App. D.C. 392, 347 F.2d 486 , vacated and remanded.

Edward L. Carey and Walter E. Gillcrist for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Dennis v. United States, ante, p. 855.


CAVANAUGH v. CALIFORNIA, <a href="/101336"> 384 U.S. 882 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 882 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court CAVANAUGH v. CALIFORNIA, 384 U.S. 882 (1966) 384 U.S. 882

CAVANAUGH v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST APPELLATE
DISTRICT. No. 747, Misc.
Decided June 20, 1966.

234 Cal. App. 2d 316, 44 Cal. Rptr. 422, appeal dismissed.

Winfield W. Foster for appellant.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, Albert W. Harris, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, and Derald E. Granberg, Deputy Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed as moot.

Page 384 U.S. 882, 883




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //