Skip to content


Castaldi Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number384 U.S. 886
AppellantCastaldi
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
castaldi v. united states - 384 u.s. 886 (1966) u.s. supreme court castaldi v. united states, 384 u.s. 886 (1966) 384 u.s. 886 castaldi v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 33. decided june 20, 1966. * certiorari granted; no. 33, 338 f.2d 883 ; no. 218, 343 f.2d 548 , vacated and remanded. [ footnote * ] together with no. 218, tramunti v. united states, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court. daniel h. greenberg for petitioner in no. 33. philip r. edelbaum for petitioner in no. 218. solicitor general cox, assistant attorney general miller, beatrice rosenberg and richard w. schmude for the united states in no. 33......
Judgment:
CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES - 384 U.S. 886 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 886 (1966) 384 U.S. 886

CASTALDI v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 33.
Decided June 20, 1966. *

Certiorari granted; No. 33, 338 F.2d 883 ; No. 218, 343 F.2d 548 , vacated and remanded.

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 218, Tramunti v. United States, also on petition for writ of certiorari to the same court.

Daniel H. Greenberg for petitioner in No. 33. Philip R. Edelbaum for petitioner in No. 218.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Miller, Beatrice Rosenberg and Richard W. Schmude for the United States in No. 33. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Theodore George Gilinsky for the United States in No. 218.

PER CURIAM.

The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgments are vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for further proceedings in the light of Shillitani v. United States, ante, p. 364.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK concurs in the result.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissents for the reasons stated in his opinion in Cheff v. Schnackenberg, ante, at 380.

Page 384 U.S. 886, 887




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //