Skip to content


Wallace Vs. Virginia - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number384 U.S. 891
AppellantWallace
RespondentVirginia
Excerpt:
.....s. w. tucker and henry l. marsh iii for petitioners. frederick t. gray for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgments are affirmed. city of greenwood v. peacock, ante, p. 808. the chief justice, mr. justice douglas, mr. justice brennan and mr. justice fortas would reverse the judgments for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of mr. justice douglas in city of greenwood v. peacock, ante, at 835. page 384 u.s. 891, 892
Judgment:
WALLACE v. VIRGINIA - 384 U.S. 891 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court WALLACE v. VIRGINIA, 384 U.S. 891 (1966) 384 U.S. 891

WALLACE ET AL. v. VIRGINIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 1011.
Decided June 20, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 357 F.2d 105 , 107, affirmed.

George E. Allen, Sr., Anthony G. Amsterdam, Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Charles Stephen Ralston, S. W. Tucker and Henry L. Marsh III for petitioners.

Frederick T. Gray for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgments are affirmed. City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, p. 808.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS would reverse the judgments for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS in City of Greenwood v. Peacock, ante, at 835.

Page 384 U.S. 891, 892




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //