Skip to content


Miller Vs. Rhay - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number384 U.S. 892
AppellantMiller
RespondentRhay
Excerpt:
.........
Judgment:
MILLER v. RHAY - 384 U.S. 892 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court MILLER v. RHAY, 384 U.S. 892 (1966) 384 U.S. 892

MILLER v. RHAY, PENITENTIARY SUPERINTENDENT.
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 1180.
Decided June 20, 1966.

Vacated and remanded.

Charles Horowitz, by appointment of the Court, post, p. 902, for petitioner.

John J. O'Connell, Attorney General of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

In light of the representations of the Attorney General of Washington and upon an examination of the entire record, the motion to remand is granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Washington is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of its opinion in Dillenburg v. Maxwell, ___ Wash. 2d ___, 413 P.2d 940.

Page 384 U.S. 892, 893




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //