Skip to content


Colonial Pipeline Co. Vs. Virginia - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number384 U.S. 268
AppellantColonial Pipeline Co.
RespondentVirginia
Excerpt:
.....of appeals of virginia. no. 985. decided may 23, 1966. 206 va. 517, 145 s. e. 2d 227, appeal dismissed. ralph h. ferrell, jr., john w. riely and howard d. mccloud for appellant. robert y. button, attorney general of virginia, and d. gardiner tyler, assistant attorney general, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. life assurance co. of pennsylvania v. pennsylvania, 384 u.s. 268 (1966) 384 u.s. 268 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court life assurance co. of pennsylvania v. pennsylvania, 384 u.s. 268 (1966) 384 u.s. 268 life assurance co. of pennsylvania v. pennsylvania. appeal from the supreme court of pennsylvania. no......
Judgment:
COLONIAL PIPELINE CO. v. VIRGINIA - 384 U.S. 268 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court COLONIAL PIPELINE CO. v. VIRGINIA, 384 U.S. 268 (1966) 384 U.S. 268

COLONIAL PIPELINE CO. v. VIRGINIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA.
No. 985.
Decided May 23, 1966.

206 Va. 517, 145 S. E. 2d 227, appeal dismissed.

Ralph H. Ferrell, Jr., John W. Riely and Howard D. McCloud for appellant.

Robert Y. Button, Attorney General of Virginia, and D. Gardiner Tyler, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


LIFE ASSURANCE CO. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PENNSYLVANIA, <a href="/101379"> 384 U.S. 268 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 268 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court LIFE ASSURANCE CO. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PENNSYLVANIA, 384 U.S. 268 (1966) 384 U.S. 268

LIFE ASSURANCE CO. OF PENNSYLVANIA v. PENNSYLVANIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 1152.
Decided May 23, 1966.

419 Pa. 370, 214 A. 2d 209, appeal dismissed.

Harry J. Rubin and Morris J. Dean for appellant.

Walter E. Alessandroni, Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and George W. Keitel and Eugene J. Anastasio, Deputy Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE FORTAS took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 384 U.S. 268, 269




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //