Skip to content


Simmons Vs. Seelatsee - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number384 U.S. 209
AppellantSimmons
RespondentSeelatsee
Excerpt:
simmons v. seelatsee - 384 u.s. 209 (1966) u.s. supreme court simmons v. seelatsee, 384 u.s. 209 (1966) 384 u.s. 209 simmons et al. v. seelatsee, chairman of the yakima tribal council, et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of washington. no. 1112. decided may 16, 1966. 244 f. supp. 808, affirmed. l. frederick paul for appellants. james b. hovis for appellees seelatsee et al. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general weisl and roger p. marquis for the united states. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. izzo v. eyman, 384 u.s. 209 (1966) 384 u.s. 209 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court izzo v. eyman, 384 u.s. 209 .....
Judgment:
SIMMONS v. SEELATSEE - 384 U.S. 209 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court SIMMONS v. SEELATSEE, 384 U.S. 209 (1966) 384 U.S. 209

SIMMONS ET AL. v. SEELATSEE, CHAIRMAN OF THE YAKIMA TRIBAL COUNCIL, ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
WASHINGTON. No. 1112.
Decided May 16, 1966.

244 F. Supp. 808, affirmed.

L. Frederick Paul for appellants.

James B. Hovis for appellees Seelatsee et al. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl and Roger P. Marquis for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


IZZO v. EYMAN, <a href="/101386"> 384 U.S. 209 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 209 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court IZZO v. EYMAN, 384 U.S. 209 (1966) 384 U.S. 209

IZZO v. EYMAN, WARDEN.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 869, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Petitioner pro se.

Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, and James S. Tegart, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment of the Supreme Court of Arizona is reversed. Jackson v. Denno, 378 U.S. 368 .

Page 384 U.S. 209, 210




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //