Skip to content


Haspel Vs. State Board of Education - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number384 U.S. 211
AppellantHaspel
RespondentState Board of Education
Excerpt:
.....for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 384 u.s. 211, 212 hanson v. chesapeake & ohio railway company, 384 u.s. 211 (1966) 384 u.s. 211 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court hanson v. chesapeake & ohio railway company, 384 u.s. 211 (1966) 384 u.s. 211 hanson et al. v. chesapeake & ohio railway company. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit. no. 1170. decided may 16, 1966. certiorari granted; vacated and remanded. robert o. ellis, jr., for petitioners. william c. beatty and amos a. bolen for respondent. per curiam. the petition for a writ of.....
Judgment:
HASPEL v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION - 384 U.S. 211 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court HASPEL v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, 384 U.S. 211 (1966) 384 U.S. 211

HASPEL v. STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 1352, Misc.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 384 U.S. 211, 212


HANSON v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, <a href="/101388"> 384 U.S. 211 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 211 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court HANSON v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY, 384 U.S. 211 (1966) 384 U.S. 211

HANSON ET AL. v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR
THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 1170.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Robert O. Ellis, Jr., for petitioners.

William C. Beatty and Amos A. Bolen for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Gunther v. San Diego & A. E. R. Co., 382 U.S. 257 .




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //