Skip to content


United States Vs. Fisher - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number384 U.S. 212
AppellantUnited States
RespondentFisher
Excerpt:
united states v. fisher - 384 u.s. 212 (1966) u.s. supreme court united states v. fisher, 384 u.s. 212 (1966) 384 u.s. 212 united states v. fisher. appeal from the united states district court for the district of new jersey. no. 700. decided may 16, 1966. affirmed. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general vinson, beatrice rosenberg and ronald l. gainer for the united states. joseph h. stamler for appellee. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice harlan would set the case for argument, postponing consideration of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits. page 384 u.s. 212, 213
Judgment:
UNITED STATES v. FISHER - 384 U.S. 212 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. FISHER, 384 U.S. 212 (1966) 384 U.S. 212

UNITED STATES v. FISHER.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY.
No. 700.
Decided May 16, 1966.

Affirmed.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson, Beatrice Rosenberg and Ronald L. Gainer for the United States.

Joseph H. Stamler for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would set the case for argument, postponing consideration of jurisdiction to the hearing of the case on the merits.

Page 384 U.S. 212, 213




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //