Skip to content


Baer Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number384 U.S. 154
AppellantBaer
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
.....from the county court of onondaga county, new york. no. 1077. decided may 2, 1966. appeal dismissed. isadore greenberg for appellant. per curiam. the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. united states v. clayton, 384 u.s. 154 (1966) 384 u.s. 154 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court united states v. clayton, 384 u.s. 154 (1966) 384 u.s. 154 united states v. clayton, commissioner of revenue of north carolina. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of north carolina. no. 1115. decided may 2, 1966. appeal dismissed. solicitor general marshall, acting assistant.....
Judgment:
BAER v. NEW YORK - 384 U.S. 154 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court BAER v. NEW YORK, 384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154

BAER v. NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK.
No. 1077.
Decided May 2, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Isadore Greenberg for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, <a href="/101393"> 384 U.S. 154 </a> (1966) 384 U.S. 154 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, 384 U.S. 154 (1966) 384 U.S. 154

UNITED STATES v. CLAYTON, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE OF NORTH CAROLINA.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1115.
Decided May 2, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

Solicitor General Marshall, Acting Assistant Attorney General Roberts, I. Henry Kutz and Robert A. Bernstein for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed.

Page 384 U.S. 154, 155




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //