Skip to content


Texas Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number384 U.S. 155
AppellantTexas
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
texas v. united states - 384 u.s. 155 (1966) u.s. supreme court texas v. united states, 384 u.s. 155 (1966) 384 u.s. 155 texas v. united states. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of texas. no. 1218. decided may 2, 1966. 252 f. supp. 234, affirmed. waggoner carr, attorney general of texas, hawthorne phillips, first assistant attorney general, and mary k. wall, assistant attorney general, for appellant. solicitor general marshall for the united states. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. harper v. virginia state board of elections, 383 u.s. 663 . mr. justice black dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in harper v. virginia state.....
Judgment:
TEXAS v. UNITED STATES - 384 U.S. 155 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court TEXAS v. UNITED STATES, 384 U.S. 155 (1966) 384 U.S. 155

TEXAS v. UNITED STATES.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
TEXAS. No. 1218.
Decided May 2, 1966.

252 F. Supp. 234, affirmed.

Waggoner Carr, Attorney General of Texas, Hawthorne Phillips, First Assistant Attorney General, and Mary K. Wall, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, supra.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN, joined by MR. JUSTICE STEWART, dissents for the reasons given in his dissenting opinion in Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections, supra.

Page 384 U.S. 155, 156




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //