Skip to content


Cross Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number383 U.S. 573
AppellantCross
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. motorlease corp. v. united states, 383 u.s. 573 (1966) 383 u.s. 573 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court motorlease corp. v. united states, 383 u.s. 573 (1966) 383 u.s. 573 motorlease corp. v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit. no. 24. decided march 21, 1966. certiorari granted; 334 f.2d 617 , reversed. ellis lyons for petitioner. solicitor general cox for the united states. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the second circuit is reversed. fribourg navigation co., inc. v......
Judgment:
CROSS v. CALIFORNIA - 383 U.S. 573 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court CROSS v. CALIFORNIA, 383 U.S. 573 (1966) 383 U.S. 573

CROSS v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA, FIRST
APPELLATE DISTRICT. No. 1161, Misc.
Decided March 21, 1966.

Appeal dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


MOTORLEASE CORP. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101439"> 383 U.S. 573 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 573 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court MOTORLEASE CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 573 (1966) 383 U.S. 573

MOTORLEASE CORP. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 24.
Decided March 21, 1966.

Certiorari granted; 334 F.2d 617 , reversed.

Ellis Lyons for petitioner.

Solicitor General Cox for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit is reversed. Fribourg Navigation Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, ante, p. 272.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK, MR. JUSTICE CLARK and MR. JUSTICE WHITE dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion of MR. JUSTICE WHITE in Fribourg Navigation Co., Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, supra.

Page 383 U.S. 573, 574




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //