Skip to content


Ciesielski Vs. Ohio - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number383 U.S. 411
AppellantCiesielski
RespondentOhio
Excerpt:
.....petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. page 383 u.s. 411, 412 united transports, inc. v. united states, 383 u.s. 411 (1966) 383 u.s. 411 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court united transports, inc. v. united states, 383 u.s. 411 (1966) 383 u.s. 411 united transports, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of oklahoma. no. 868. decided march 7, 1966. 245 f. supp. 561, 570, affirmed. james w. wrape, robert e. joyner and reagan sayers for appellants. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, howard e. shapiro, robert w. ginnane and robert s. burk for the united states et al.; paul f. sullivan for kenosha auto.....
Judgment:
CIESIELSKI v. OHIO - 383 U.S. 411 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court CIESIELSKI v. OHIO, 383 U.S. 411 (1966) 383 U.S. 411

CIESIELSKI v. OHIO.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 920.
Decided March 7, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Theodore R. Saker for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 383 U.S. 411, 412


UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101446"> 383 U.S. 411 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 411 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 411 (1966) 383 U.S. 411

UNITED TRANSPORTS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
OKLAHOMA. No. 868.
Decided March 7, 1966.

245 F. Supp. 561, 570, affirmed.

James W. Wrape, Robert E. Joyner and Reagan Sayers for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al.; Paul F. Sullivan for Kenosha Auto Transport Corp., and Donald W. Smith for Commercial Carriers, Inc., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgments are affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //