Skip to content


Mcmorris Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number383 U.S. 102
AppellantMcmorris
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....is denied. page 383 u.s. 102, 103 louisville & nashville railroad co. v. united states, 383 u.s. 102 (1966) 383 u.s. 102 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court louisville & nashville railroad co. v. united states, 383 u.s. 102 (1966) 383 u.s. 102 louisville & nashville railroad co. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of kentucky. no. 792. decided february 21, 1966. 244 f. supp. 337, affirmed. h. g. breetz, w. l. grubbs, m. d. jones and joseph l. lenihan for appellant. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, howard e. shapiro, robert w. ginnane and leonard s. goodman for the united states et al. edward j. hickey, jr., james l......
Judgment:
McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA - 383 U.S. 102 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA, 383 U.S. 102 (1966) 383 U.S. 102

McMORRIS v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE APPELLATE DEPARTMENT OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. No. 1036, Misc.
Decided February 21, 1966.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 383 U.S. 102, 103


LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101466"> 383 U.S. 102 </a> (1966) 383 U.S. 102 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 383 U.S. 102 (1966) 383 U.S. 102

LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
KENTUCKY. No. 792.
Decided February 21, 1966.

244 F. Supp. 337, affirmed.

H. G. Breetz, W. L. Grubbs, M. D. Jones and Joseph L. Lenihan for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Edward J. Hickey, Jr., James L. Highsaw, Jr., and Robert E. Hogan for appellee Railway Labor Executives' Association.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //