Skip to content


Convoy Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 371
AppellantConvoy Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
convoy co. v. united states - 382 u.s. 371 (1966) u.s. supreme court convoy co. v. united states, 382 u.s. 371 (1966) 382 u.s. 371 convoy co. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of oregon. no. 719. decided january 17, 1966. affirmed. marvin handler and moe m. tonkon for appellant. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, robert b. hummel, robert w. ginnane, i. k. hay and betty jo christian for the united states et al. donald w. smith for commercial carriers, inc., appellee. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. john v. john, 382 u.s. 371 (1966) 382 u.s. 371 (1966) "> u.s. supreme court .....
Judgment:
CONVOY CO. v. UNITED STATES - 382 U.S. 371 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court CONVOY CO. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 371 (1966) 382 U.S. 371

CONVOY CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON.
No. 719.
Decided January 17, 1966.

Affirmed.

Marvin Handler and Moe M. Tonkon for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane, I. K. Hay and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al. Donald W. Smith for Commercial Carriers, Inc., appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


JOHN v. JOHN, <a href="/101492"> 382 U.S. 371 </a> (1966) 382 U.S. 371 (1966) "> U.S. Supreme Court JOHN v. JOHN, 382 U.S. 371 (1966) 382 U.S. 371

JOHN v. JOHN.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 699.
Decided January 17, 1966.

16 N. Y. 2d 675, 210 N. E. 2d 457, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Warner Pyne for appellant.

Irwin L. Germaise for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dispense with printing the motion to dismiss or affirm is granted.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 382 U.S. 371, 372




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //