Skip to content


American Trucking Associations, Inc. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number382 U.S. 372
AppellantAmerican Trucking Associations, Inc.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
american trucking associations, inc. v. united states - 382 u.s. 372 (1966) u.s. supreme court american trucking associations, inc. v. united states, 382 u.s. 372 (1966) 382 u.s. 372 american trucking associations, inc., et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of pennsylvania. no. 510. decided january 17, 1966. * [ footnote * ] together with no. 511, pennsylvania railroad co. v. united states et al., also on appeal from the same court. 242 f. supp. 890, affirmed. peter t. beardsley, richard r. sigmon, bryce rea, jr., and ralph c. busser, jr., for appellants in no. 510. carl helmetag, jr., for appellant in no. 511. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney.....
Judgment:
AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES - 382 U.S. 372 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 382 U.S. 372 (1966) 382 U.S. 372

AMERICAN TRUCKING ASSOCIATIONS, INC., ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
PENNSYLVANIA. No. 510.
Decided January 17, 1966. *

[ Footnote * ] Together with No. 511, Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. United States et al., also on appeal from the same court.

242 F. Supp. 890, affirmed.

Peter T. Beardsley, Richard R. Sigmon, Bryce Rea, Jr., and Ralph C. Busser, Jr., for appellants in No. 510. Carl Helmetag, Jr., for appellant in No. 511.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Lionel Kestenbaum and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al. John F. Donelan and John M. Cleary for National Industrial Traffic League, appellee in both cases. Joseph E. Keller and W. H. Borghesani, Jr., for South Paterson Trucking Co., Inc., et al.; and William A. Goichman and Joseph C. Bruno for Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, appellees in No. 511.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 382 U.S. 372, 373




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //