Skip to content


Miller Vs. Rhay - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number383 U.S. 965
AppellantMiller
RespondentRhay
Excerpt:
miller v. rhay - 383 u.s. 965 (1966) u.s. supreme court miller v. rhay , 383 u.s. 965 (1966) 383 u.s. 965 robert a. miller, petitioner, v. b. j. rhay, superintendent, washington state penitentiary. no. 406, misc. supreme court of the united states april 4, 1966 robert a. miller, pro se. john j. o'connell, atty. gen. of washington, and stephen c. way, asst. atty. gen., for respondent. motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of washington granted. case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.[ miller v. rhay 383 u.s. 965 (1966) ]
Judgment:
MILLER v. RHAY - 383 U.S. 965 (1966)
U.S. Supreme Court MILLER v. RHAY , 383 U.S. 965 (1966)

383 U.S. 965

Robert A. MILLER, petitioner,
v.
B. J. RHAY, Superintendent, Washington State Penitentiary.
No. 406, Misc.

Supreme Court of the United States

April 4, 1966

Robert A. Miller, pro se.

John J. O'Connell, Atty. Gen. of Washington, and Stephen C. Way, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Washington granted. Case transferred to the appellate docket and placed on the summary calendar.[ Miller v. Rhay 383 U.S. 965 (1966) ]


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //