Skip to content


Lantz Vs. Lynden Transfer, Inc. - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 426
AppellantLantz
RespondentLynden Transfer, Inc.
Excerpt:
lantz v. lynden transfer, inc. - 389 u.s. 426 (1967) u.s. supreme court lantz v. lynden transfer, inc., 389 u.s. 426 (1967) 389 u.s. 426 lantz, dba alaska truck transport, inc. v. lynden transfer, inc., et al. appeal from the united states district court for the western district of washington. no. 623. decided december 18, 1967. 263 f. supp. 336, affirmed. james t. johnson for appellee lynden transfer, inc. acting solicitor general spritzer and robert w. ginnane for the united states et al. per curiam. the motion of douglas lantz for leave to intervene and for other relief is denied. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. burke-parsons-bowlby corp. v. united states, 389 u.s. 426 (1967) .....
Judgment:
LANTZ v. LYNDEN TRANSFER, INC. - 389 U.S. 426 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court LANTZ v. LYNDEN TRANSFER, INC., 389 U.S. 426 (1967) 389 U.S. 426

LANTZ, DBA ALASKA TRUCK TRANSPORT, INC. v. LYNDEN TRANSFER, INC., ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT
OF WASHINGTON. No. 623.
Decided December 18, 1967.

263 F. Supp. 336, affirmed.

James T. Johnson for appellee Lynden Transfer, Inc.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of Douglas Lantz for leave to intervene and for other relief is denied. The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.


BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. v. UNITED STATES, <a href="/101522"> 389 U.S. 426 </a> (1967) 389 U.S. 426 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 426 (1967) 389 U.S. 426

BURKE-PARSONS-BOWLBY CORP. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT
OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 711.
Decided December 18, 1967.

268 F. Supp. 203, affirmed.

Gordon P. MacDougall for appellants.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al., and Laidler B. Mackall for the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 426, 427




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //