Skip to content


Township of Springfield Vs. Green - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 331
AppellantTownship of Springfield
RespondentGreen
Excerpt:
.....appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. devore v. west virginia board of dental examiners, 389 u.s. 331 (1967) 389 u.s. 331 (1967) "> u.s. supreme court devore v. west virginia board of dental examiners, 389 u.s. 331 (1967) 389 u.s. 331 devore v. west virginia board of dental examiners et al. appeal from the supreme court of appeals of west virginia. no. 686. decided december 11, 1967. appeal dismissed. william c. beatty for appellant. c. donald robertson, attorney general of west virginia, and thomas b. yost, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal.....
Judgment:
TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD v. GREEN - 389 U.S. 331 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD v. GREEN, 389 U.S. 331 (1967) 389 U.S. 331

TOWNSHIP OF SPRINGFIELD v. GREEN ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA.
No. 675.
Decided December 11, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Read Rocap, Jr., for appellant.

R. Winfield Baile for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.


DEVORE v. WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS, <a href="/101535"> 389 U.S. 331 </a> (1967) 389 U.S. 331 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court DEVORE v. WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS, 389 U.S. 331 (1967) 389 U.S. 331

DEVORE v. WEST VIRGINIA BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA.
No. 686.
Decided December 11, 1967.

Appeal dismissed.

William C. Beatty for appellant.

C. Donald Robertson, Attorney General of West Virginia, and Thomas B. Yost, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 389 U.S. 331, 332




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //