Skip to content


Greyhound Lines, Inc. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 216
AppellantGreyhound Lines, Inc.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
greyhound lines, inc. v. united states - 389 u.s. 216 (1967) u.s. supreme court greyhound lines, inc. v. united states, 389 u.s. 216 (1967) 389 u.s. 216 greyhound lines, inc. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 555. decided december 4, 1967. 268 f. supp. 746, affirmed. amos mathews and robert j. bernard for appellant. solicitor general griswold, assistant attorney general turner, howard e. shapiro, robert w. ginnane and raymond m. zimmet for the united states et al., and john l. arrington, jr., for missouri, kansas & oklahoma coach lines, appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice douglas.....
Judgment:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES - 389 U.S. 216 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court GREYHOUND LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 216 (1967) 389 U.S. 216

GREYHOUND LINES, INC. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF ILLINOIS. No. 555.
Decided December 4, 1967.

268 F. Supp. 746, affirmed.

Amos Mathews and Robert J. Bernard for appellant.

Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Raymond M. Zimmet for the United States et al., and John L. Arrington, Jr., for Missouri, Kansas & Oklahoma Coach Lines, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 389 U.S. 216, 217




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //