Skip to content


Baltimore and Ohio Chicago Term. R. Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 88
AppellantBaltimore and Ohio Chicago Term. R. Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
baltimore & ohio chicago term. r. co. v. united states - 389 u.s. 88 (1967) u.s. supreme court baltimore & ohio chicago term. r. co. v. united states, 389 u.s. 88 (1967) 389 u.s. 88 baltimore & ohio chicago terminal railroad co. et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 539. decided november 6, 1967. 279 f. supp. 270, affirmed. john h. gobel for appellants. acting solicitor general spritzer, assistant attorney general turner, robert w. ginnane and nahum litt for the united states et al., and don mcdevitt for atchison, topeka & santa fe et al., appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. .....
Judgment:
BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERM. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES - 389 U.S. 88 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERM. R. CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 88 (1967) 389 U.S. 88

BALTIMORE & OHIO CHICAGO TERMINAL RAILROAD CO. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES
ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 539.
Decided November 6, 1967.

279 F. Supp. 270, affirmed.

John H. Gobel for appellants.

Acting Solicitor General Spritzer, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert W. Ginnane and Nahum Litt for the United States et al., and Don McDevitt for Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

Page 389 U.S. 88, 89




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //