Skip to content


Chance Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 89
AppellantChance
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....v. california, 389 u.s. 89 (1967) 389 u.s. 89 chance v. california. on petition for writ of certiorari to the superior court of california, county of san mateo. no. 306, misc. decided november 6, 1967. certiorari granted; judgment reversed. marshall w. krause for petitioner. thomas c. lynch, attorney general of california, and robert r. granucci and michael j. phelan, deputy attorneys general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed. redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . mr. justice harlan would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476, 496 , 500-503, and in his.....
Judgment:
CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA - 389 U.S. 89 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA, 389 U.S. 89 (1967) 389 U.S. 89

CHANCE v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF
CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO. No. 306, Misc.
Decided November 6, 1967.

Certiorari granted; judgment reversed.

Marshall W. Krause for petitioner.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Robert R. Granucci and Michael J. Phelan, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would affirm for the reasons set forth in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , 500-503, and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 .

Page 389 U.S. 89, 90




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //