Skip to content


Central Magazine Sales, Ltd. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 50
AppellantCentral Magazine Sales, Ltd.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
central magazine sales, ltd. v. united states - 389 u.s. 50 (1967) u.s. supreme court central magazine sales, ltd. v. united states, 389 u.s. 50 (1967) 389 u.s. 50 central magazine sales, ltd. v. united states. on petition for writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit. no. 368. decided october 23, 1967. certiorari granted; 373 f.2d 633 , reversed. richard lipsitz for petitioner. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general vinson and jerome m. feit for the united states. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit is reversed. redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . mr......
Judgment:
CENTRAL MAGAZINE SALES, LTD. v. UNITED STATES - 389 U.S. 50 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court CENTRAL MAGAZINE SALES, LTD. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 50 (1967) 389 U.S. 50

CENTRAL MAGAZINE SALES, LTD. v. UNITED STATES.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 368.
Decided October 23, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 373 F.2d 633 , reversed.

Richard Lipsitz for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Jerome M. Feit for the United States.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN concurs in the judgment of reversal upon the premises stated in his separate opinion in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , and in his dissenting opinion in Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 , 457.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE believes this case is controlled by Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476 , and the judgment should be affirmed in accordance with the principles enunciated in the opinion of the Court in that case.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 389 U.S. 50, 51




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //