Skip to content


Garber Vs. Kansas - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 51
AppellantGarber
RespondentKansas
Excerpt:
.....court of kansas. no. 393. decided october 23, 1967. 197 kan. 567, 419 p.2d 896, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied. marvin m. karpatkin, e. dexter galloway and melvin l. wulf for appellant. robert c. londerholm, attorney general of kansas, and j. richard foth, assistant attorney general, for appellee. leo pfeffer for the national committee for amish religious freedom, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied. the chief justice, mr. justice douglas, and mr. justice fortas are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be.....
Judgment:
GARBER v. KANSAS - 389 U.S. 51 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court GARBER v. KANSAS, 389 U.S. 51 (1967) 389 U.S. 51

GARBER v. KANSAS.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF KANSAS.
No. 393.
Decided October 23, 1967.

197 Kan. 567, 419 P.2d 896, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Marvin M. Karpatkin, E. Dexter Galloway and Melvin L. Wulf for appellant.

Robert C. Londerholm, Attorney General of Kansas, and J. Richard Foth, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Leo Pfeffer for the National Committee for Amish Religious Freedom, as amicus curiae, in support of appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS, and MR. JUSTICE FORTAS are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.

Page 389 U.S. 51, 52




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //