Skip to content


Skolnick Vs. Board of Commissioners of Cook County - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 26
AppellantSkolnick
RespondentBoard of Commissioners of Cook County
Excerpt:
.....1967. vacated and remanded. william g. clark, attorney general of illinois, and richard a. michael, assistant attorney general, for appellees. per curiam. the judgment of the district court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the district court may enter a fresh decree from which appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the court of appeals. moody v. flowers, 387 u.s. 97 . raymond v. toffany, 389 u.s. 26 (1967) 389 u.s. 26 (1967) "> u.s. supreme court raymond v. toffany, 389 u.s. 26 (1967) 389 u.s. 26 raymond v. toffany, commissioner of motor vehicles of new york. appeal from the court of appeals of new york. no. 572, misc. decided october 16, 1967. appeal.....
Judgment:
SKOLNICK v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COOK COUNTY - 389 U.S. 26 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court SKOLNICK v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COOK COUNTY, 389 U.S. 26 (1967) 389 U.S. 26

SKOLNICK v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF COOK COUNTY ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT
OF ILLINOIS. No. 91, Misc.
Decided October 16, 1967.

Vacated and remanded.

William G. Clark, Attorney General of Illinois, and Richard A. Michael, Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which appellant may, if he wishes, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U.S. 97 .


RAYMOND v. TOFFANY, <a href="/101578"> 389 U.S. 26 </a> (1967) 389 U.S. 26 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court RAYMOND v. TOFFANY, 389 U.S. 26 (1967) 389 U.S. 26

RAYMOND v. TOFFANY, COMMISSIONER OF MOTOR VEHICLES OF NEW YORK.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.
No. 572, Misc.
Decided October 16, 1967.

Appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 389 U.S. 26, 27




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //