Skip to content


Lordi Vs. Epstein - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 29
AppellantLordi
RespondentEpstein
Excerpt:
lordi v. epstein - 389 u.s. 29 (1967) u.s. supreme court lordi v. epstein, 389 u.s. 29 (1967) 389 u.s. 29 lordi, director of division of alcoholic beverage control, department of law and public safety of new jersey v. epstein et al., trading as stratford international tobacco co. appeal from the united states district court for the district of new jersey. no. 322. decided october 16, 1967. 261 f. supp. 921, affirmed. arthur j. sills, attorney general of new jersey, and joseph a. hoffman, assistant attorney general, for appellant. charles h. tuttle for appellees. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. cf. hostetter v. idlewild bon voyage liquor corp., 377 u.s. 324 . mr. justice.....
Judgment:
LORDI v. EPSTEIN - 389 U.S. 29 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court LORDI v. EPSTEIN, 389 U.S. 29 (1967) 389 U.S. 29

LORDI, DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL, DEPARTMENT
OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY OF NEW JERSEY v. EPSTEIN ET AL.,
TRADING AS STRATFORD INTERNATIONAL TOBACCO CO. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 322.
Decided October 16, 1967.

261 F. Supp. 921, affirmed.

Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, and Joseph A. Hoffman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.

Charles H. Tuttle for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. Cf. Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp., 377 U.S. 324 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

Page 389 U.S. 29, 30




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //