Skip to content


Newton Trucking Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 30
AppellantNewton Trucking Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
newton trucking co. v. united states - 389 u.s. 30 (1967) u.s. supreme court newton trucking co. v. united states, 389 u.s. 30 (1967) 389 u.s. 30 lester c. newton trucking co. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the district of delaware. no. 328. decided october 16, 1967. 264 f. supp. 869, affirmed. h. charles ephraim for appellant. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, howard e. shapiro, robert w. ginnane and john e. faulk for the united states et al. per curiam. the motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice harlan and mr. justice white would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument. mr. justice marshall took.....
Judgment:
NEWTON TRUCKING CO. v. UNITED STATES - 389 U.S. 30 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court NEWTON TRUCKING CO. v. UNITED STATES, 389 U.S. 30 (1967) 389 U.S. 30

LESTER C. NEWTON TRUCKING CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.
No. 328.
Decided October 16, 1967.

264 F. Supp. 869, affirmed.

H. Charles Ephraim for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and John E. Faulk for the United States et al.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN and MR. JUSTICE WHITE would note probable jurisdiction and set the case for oral argument.

MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 389 U.S. 30, 31




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //