Skip to content


Petronia Vs. Alaska - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 7
AppellantPetronia
RespondentAlaska
Excerpt:
.....court of washington. no. 108. decided october 9, 1967. 69 wash. 2d 460, 418 p.2d 755, appeal dismissed. j. duane vance for appellants. edgar paul boyko, attorney general of alaska, for appellee. per curiam. the motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. mr. justice douglas is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted. morgan v. alabama, 389 u.s. 7 (1967) 389 u.s. 7 (1967) "> u.s. supreme court morgan v. alabama, 389 u.s. 7 (1967) 389 u.s. 7 morgan et al., dba m & t gum machine co. v. alabama. appeal from the supreme court of alabama. no. 170. decided october 9, 1967. 280 ala. 414, 194 so.2d 820, appeal dismissed and.....
Judgment:
PETRONIA v. ALASKA - 389 U.S. 7 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court PETRONIA v. ALASKA, 389 U.S. 7 (1967) 389 U.S. 7

PETRONIA ET AL. v. ALASKA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON.
No. 108.
Decided October 9, 1967.

69 Wash. 2d 460, 418 P.2d 755, appeal dismissed.

J. Duane Vance for appellants.

Edgar Paul Boyko, Attorney General of Alaska, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

MR. JUSTICE DOUGLAS is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.


MORGAN v. ALABAMA, <a href="/101586"> 389 U.S. 7 </a> (1967) 389 U.S. 7 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court MORGAN v. ALABAMA, 389 U.S. 7 (1967) 389 U.S. 7

MORGAN ET AL., DBA M & T GUM MACHINE CO. v. ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 170.
Decided October 9, 1967.

280 Ala. 414, 194 So.2d 820, appeal dismissed and certiorari denied.

Robert B. Stewart for appellants.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston and William H. Burton, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for a writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Page 389 U.S. 7, 8




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //