Skip to content


Hamrick Vs. Alabama - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 10
AppellantHamrick
RespondentAlabama
Excerpt:
.....is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. smith v. arizona, 389 u.s. 10 (1967) 389 u.s. 10 (1967) "> u.s. supreme court smith v. arizona, 389 u.s. 10 (1967) 389 u.s. 10 smith v. arizona. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of arizona. no. 26, misc. decided october 9, 1967. certiorari granted; 98 ariz. 45, 401 p.2d 739, vacated and remanded. darrell f. smith, attorney general of arizona, and carl waag, assistant attorney general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the supreme court of arizona in.....
Judgment:
HAMRICK v. ALABAMA - 389 U.S. 10 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court HAMRICK v. ALABAMA, 389 U.S. 10 (1967) 389 U.S. 10

HAMRICK v. ALABAMA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA.
No. 345.
Decided October 9, 1967.

281 Ala. 150, 199 So.2d 849, appeal dismissed.

William B. McCollough, Jr., for appellant.

MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Robert P. Bradley and Walter S. Turner, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.


SMITH v. ARIZONA, <a href="/101589"> 389 U.S. 10 </a> (1967) 389 U.S. 10 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court SMITH v. ARIZONA, 389 U.S. 10 (1967) 389 U.S. 10

SMITH v. ARIZONA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA.
No. 26, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 98 Ariz. 45, 401 P.2d 739, vacated and remanded.

Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General of Arizona, and Carl Waag, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of Arizona in light of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 .

MR. JUSTICE BLACK and MR. JUSTICE STEWART dissent.

Page 389 U.S. 10, 11




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //