Skip to content


Cobb Vs. Georgia - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number389 U.S. 12
AppellantCobb
RespondentGeorgia
Excerpt:
cobb v. georgia - 389 u.s. 12 (1967) u.s. supreme court cobb v. georgia, 389 u.s. 12 (1967) 389 u.s. 12 cobb v. georgia. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of georgia. no. 51, misc. decided october 9, 1967. certiorari granted; 222 ga. 733, 152 s. e. 2d 403, reversed. jack greenberg, james m. nabrit iii, michael meltsner and howard moore, jr., for petitioner. arthur k. bolton, attorney general of georgia, g. ernest tidwell, executive assistant attorney general, marion o. gordon, assistant attorney general, and george d. lawrence, solicitor general, for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is reversed......
Judgment:
COBB v. GEORGIA - 389 U.S. 12 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court COBB v. GEORGIA, 389 U.S. 12 (1967) 389 U.S. 12

COBB v. GEORGIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.
No. 51, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 222 Ga. 733, 152 S. E. 2d 403, reversed.

Jack Greenberg, James M. Nabrit III, Michael Meltsner and Howard Moore, Jr., for petitioner.

Arthur K. Bolton, Attorney General of Georgia, G. Ernest Tidwell, Executive Assistant Attorney General, Marion O. Gordon, Assistant Attorney General, and George D. Lawrence, Solicitor General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is reversed. Whitus v. Georgia, 385 U.S. 545 .


PHILLIPS v. INDIANA, <a href="/101591"> 389 U.S. 12 </a> (1967) 389 U.S. 12 (1967) "> U.S. Supreme Court PHILLIPS v. INDIANA, 389 U.S. 12 (1967) 389 U.S. 12

PHILLIPS v. INDIANA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.
No. 288, Misc.
Decided October 9, 1967.

___ Ind. ___, 222 N. E. 2d 821, appeal dismissed.

William C. Erbecker for appellant.

PER CURIAM.

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Page 389 U.S. 12, 13




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //