Skip to content


Friedman Vs. New York - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number388 U.S. 441
AppellantFriedman
RespondentNew York
Excerpt:
.....separate opinions in roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476, 496 , and memoirs v. massachusetts, 383 u.s. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm. page 388 u.s. 441, 442 .....
Judgment:
FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK - 388 U.S. 441 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK, 388 U.S. 441 (1967) 388 U.S. 441

FRIEDMAN v. NEW YORK.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME
COURT OF NEW YORK, FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT. No. 7.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; reversed.

Ira H. Holley and Eugene Gressman for petitioner.

Frank S. Hogan for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Judicial Department, is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 441, 442




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //