Skip to content


New York Central Railroad Co. Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number388 U.S. 445
AppellantNew York Central Railroad Co.
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
.....york central railroad co. v. united states - 388 u.s. 445 (1967) u.s. supreme court new york central railroad co. v. united states, 388 u.s. 445 (1967) 388 u.s. 445 new york central railroad co. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 58. decided june 12, 1967. 244 f. supp. 955, affirmed. john a. daily for appellant. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, robert b. hummel, robert w. ginnane and robert s. burk for the united states et al., and peter t. beardsley, harry j. jordan, william r. rubbert, r. edwin brady, bryce rea, jr., james e. wilson, guy h. postell, ferdinand born, legrand a. carlston, f. h. lynch, jr., roland rice, homer s......
Judgment:
NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES - 388 U.S. 445 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES, 388 U.S. 445 (1967) 388 U.S. 445

NEW YORK CENTRAL RAILROAD CO. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 58.
Decided June 12, 1967.

244 F. Supp. 955, affirmed.

John A. Daily for appellant.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al., and Peter T. Beardsley, Harry J. Jordan, William R. Rubbert, R. Edwin Brady, Bryce Rea, Jr., James E. Wilson, Guy H. Postell, Ferdinand Born, LeGrand A. Carlston, F. H. Lynch, Jr., Roland Rice, Homer S. Carpenter, John S. Fessenden and Richard R. Sigmon for the American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al., appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion of American Trucking Associations, Inc., et al., to be added as parties appellee is granted.

The motion to affirm is granted and those portions of the judgment of the District Court from which appellant is appealing are affirmed.

Page 388 U.S. 445, 446




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //