Skip to content


Mazes Vs. Ohio - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number388 U.S. 453
AppellantMazes
RespondentOhio
Excerpt:
mazes v. ohio - 388 u.s. 453 (1967) u.s. supreme court mazes v. ohio, 388 u.s. 453 (1967) 388 u.s. 453 mazes v. ohio. on petition for writ of certiorari to the supreme court of ohio. no. 896. decided june 12, 1967. certiorari granted; 7 ohio st. 2d 136, 218 n. e. 2d 725, reversed. stanley m. dietz for petitioner. per curiam. the petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the supreme court of ohio is reversed. redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . the chief justice, mr. justice clark, and mr. justice harlan would grant the petition and set the case for oral argument on the ohio statute. page 388 u.s. 453, 454
Judgment:
MAZES v. OHIO - 388 U.S. 453 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court MAZES v. OHIO, 388 U.S. 453 (1967) 388 U.S. 453

MAZES v. OHIO.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO.
No. 896.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 7 Ohio St. 2d 136, 218 N. E. 2d 725, reversed.

Stanley M. Dietz for petitioner.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the Supreme Court of Ohio is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE HARLAN would grant the petition and set the case for oral argument on the Ohio statute.

Page 388 U.S. 453, 454




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //