Skip to content


Schackman Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number388 U.S. 454
AppellantSchackman
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....and philip e. grey for appellee. per curiam. the judgments of the superior court of california, county of los angeles, are reversed. redrup v. new york, 386 u.s. 767 . the chief justice, mr. justice clark, and mr. justice brennan would affirm the judgments of the lower court. ginzburg v. united states, 383 u.s. 463 . mr. justice harlan adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in roth v. united states, 354 u.s. 476, 496 , and memoirs v. massachusetts, 383 u.s. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm. page 388 u.s. 454, 455
Judgment:
SCHACKMAN v. CALIFORNIA - 388 U.S. 454 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court SCHACKMAN v. CALIFORNIA, 388 U.S. 454 (1967) 388 U.S. 454

SCHACKMAN ET AL. v. CALIFORNIA.
APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES.
No. 995.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Judgments reversed.

Burton Marks for appellants.

Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The judgments of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, are reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U.S. 767 .

THE CHIEF JUSTICE, MR. JUSTICE CLARK, and MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN would affirm the judgments of the lower court. Ginzburg v. United States, 383 U.S. 463 .

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN adheres to the views expressed in his separate opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U.S. 476, 496 , and Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U.S. 413, 455 , and on the basis of the reasoning set forth therein would affirm.

Page 388 U.S. 454, 455




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //