Skip to content


Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number388 U.S. 455
AppellantOrder of Railway Conductors and Brakemen
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
order of railway conductors & brakemen v. united states - 388 u.s. 455 (1967) u.s. supreme court order of railway conductors & brakemen v. united states, 388 u.s. 455 (1967) 388 u.s. 455 order of railway conductors and brakemen et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the northern district of illinois. no. 1093. decided june 12, 1967. 263 f. supp. 650, affirmed. harry wilmarth for appellants. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, howard e. shapiro, robert w. ginnane and betty jo christian for the united states et al., and robert h. bierma and david l. wilson for appellee pennsylvania railroad co. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the.....
Judgment:
ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS & BRAKEMEN v. UNITED STATES - 388 U.S. 455 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS & BRAKEMEN v. UNITED STATES, 388 U.S. 455 (1967) 388 U.S. 455

ORDER OF RAILWAY CONDUCTORS AND BRAKEMEN ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
ILLINOIS. No. 1093.
Decided June 12, 1967.

263 F. Supp. 650, affirmed.

Harry Wilmarth for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Betty Jo Christian for the United States et al., and Robert H. Bierma and David L. Wilson for appellee Pennsylvania Railroad Co.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE BLACK is of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for oral argument.

Page 388 U.S. 455, 456




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //