Skip to content


Stellas Vs. Esperdy - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number388 U.S. 462
AppellantStellas
RespondentEsperdy
Excerpt:
.....attorney general vinson and beatrice rosenberg for respondent. per curiam. the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the united states district court for the southern district of new york with directions that it be returned to the immigration and naturalization service for further administrative proceedings. page 388 u.s. 462, 463
Judgment:
STELLAS v. ESPERDY - 388 U.S. 462 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court STELLAS v. ESPERDY, 388 U.S. 462 (1967) 388 U.S. 462

STELLAS v. ESPERDY, DISTRICT DIRECTOR, IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION
SERVICE.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 934, Misc.
Decided June 12, 1967.

Certiorari granted; 366 F.2d 266 , vacated and remanded.

Anna Mamalakis Pappas and Omar Z. Ghobashy for petitioner.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Vinson and Beatrice Rosenberg for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York with directions that it be returned to the Immigration and Naturalization Service for further administrative proceedings.

Page 388 U.S. 462, 463




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //