Skip to content


Aluminum Co. of America Vs. United States - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number387 U.S. 573
AppellantAluminum Co. of America
RespondentUnited States
Excerpt:
aluminum co. of america v. united states - 387 u.s. 573 (1967) u.s. supreme court aluminum co. of america v. united states, 387 u.s. 573 (1967) 387 u.s. 573 aluminum co. of america et al. v. united states et al. appeal from the united states district court for the eastern district of arkansas. no. 1159. decided june 5, 1967. 263 f. supp. 480, affirmed. dickson r. loos for appellants. solicitor general marshall, assistant attorney general turner, howard e. shapiro, robert w. ginnane and leonard s. goodman for the united states et al. harry b. latourette and robert h. stahlheber for rail carrier appellees. per curiam. the motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. mr. justice harlan took no part in the.....
Judgment:
ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES - 387 U.S. 573 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES, 387 U.S. 573 (1967) 387 U.S. 573

ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF
ARKANSAS. No. 1159.
Decided June 5, 1967.

263 F. Supp. 480, affirmed.

Dickson R. Loos for appellants.

Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Howard E. Shapiro, Robert W. Ginnane and Leonard S. Goodman for the United States et al. Harry B. LaTourette and Robert H. Stahlheber for rail carrier appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Page 387 U.S. 573, 574




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //