Skip to content


Gills Vs. California - Court Judgment

LegalCrystal Citation
CourtUS Supreme Court
Decided On
Case Number387 U.S. 574
AppellantGills
RespondentCalifornia
Excerpt:
.....forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. the judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the court of appeal of california, third appellate district, for further consideration in light of chapman v. california, 386 u.s. 18 . page 387 u.s. 574, 575 .....
Judgment:
GILLS v. CALIFORNIA - 387 U.S. 574 (1967)
U.S. Supreme Court GILLS v. CALIFORNIA, 387 U.S. 574 (1967) 387 U.S. 574

GILLS v. CALIFORNIA.
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 1043, Misc.
Decided June 5, 1967.

Certiorari granted; vacated and remanded.

Petitioner pro se.

Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General of California, and Edsel W. Haws and Daniel J. Kremer, Deputy Attorneys General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeal of California, Third Appellate District, for further consideration in light of Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 .

Page 387 U.S. 574, 575




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organizer Client Files //